Q: Is cannabis harmful to health?
A: No, not pure cannabis. See The Lancet and Judge Young,
The Merck Manual, LaGuardia, Wootton, Shafer, Jamaican Studies, Costa Rica Studies.
Q: Is cannabis poisonous? / Is there a fatal dose? A: No. It has been established
that there is no conceivable toxic amount of cannabis for human beings. Medicinal
substances frequently have a dosage above which death may follow after consumption.
This quantity is known as the LD-50 rating - that is the dose above which 50
per cent of animals tested have dies. It has never been possible to give enough
cannabis to an animal to kill it. It is estimated that the LD-50 for cannabis
is around 1:20,000, which means that an average human would have to be given
at least 20,000 times as much cannabis as is contained in the average joint
or spliff. Based upon the dosage supplied to patients on the NIDA program in
the USA, this would mean consumption of some 1500 pounds in weight of cannabis
within 15 minutes to induce death. This of course is impossible and cannabis
can accurately be described as non-toxic.
The figure of 20,000, sometimes quoted as 40,000, was based upon research carried
out in the laboratory on mice using concentrated THC.
Q: Does cannabis intoxicate?
A: Not in the sense of losing control, which is what intoxication does. Toxins
produce intoxication; cannabis is not toxic. The word "intoxicate"
is semantically incorrectly applied to cannabis.
Q: Is cannabis THC?
A: Tetrahydrocannabinol is one of hundreds of cannabinoids in cannabis. THC
is not cannabis, cannabis is not THC.
Q: What are the effects of cannabis?
A: We'd like to simply say 'take it and see' but that would be a crime! Cannabis
relaxes alpha waves produced by the brain. The effect is usually mild, relaxing
and pleasant. Any undesirable or unpleasant effects or high dosed or in the
novice wears off as the cannabis wears off. It can produce giggles, increase
concentration, stimulate appetite, help sleep etc. Many artists and sportsmen
use cannabis. We must be careful to distinguish between the effects of pure
cannabis and those of the dubious quality substances often sold on the street,
which may contain drugs.
Q: Does cannabis damage the reproductive system?
A: No. This false claim was based on the work of Dr Gabriel Nahas who experimented
with cells in Petri dishes. The scientific community has rejected Nahas' generalisation
from the laboratory dish to human beings. Studies of humans have failed to reveal
any damage. Moreover we all know plenty of people who have used cannabis for
years and they all have plenty of normal, healthy children. See also Greek Studies.
Q: Does cannabis damage the immune system?
A: No. Again there is no evidence. Two studies in 1978 and one in 1988 showed
that cannabis actually stimulates the immune system.
Q: Does cannabis impair short-term memory?
A: No. Some people may find themselves distracted whilst others find cannabis
aids concentration and improves memory. That is why so many good musicians smoke
cannabis and are able to remember complex series of notes and words.
Q: Is today's cannabis more potent than in the past?
No. It is about the same. In the past delays in analysis effected results. Potency
cannot be determined by the amount of THC alone. The most potent form of cannabis
that was probably that sold as 'American Cannabis' in the 1920's.
Q: What does cannabis smoke contain?
A: Over two thousand different chemicals, none of which produces harm. Compared
with coffee, which contains over 800 volatile chemicals, only 21 of which have
ever been tested on animals and 16 of those caused cancers in rats.
Q: How many convicted annually?
A: In 1994 there were over 72,000 convictions in the UK. This was 83% of 'drugs'
convictions. This costs hundreds of millions of pounds.
Q: How many people die as a result of cannabis use?
A: None. Ever. It is not toxic, there is no overdose.
Q: Is cannabis addictive?
A: No. It is habit-forming only in the sense that it is natural to wish to repeat
a pleasant experience. There is no withdrawal. One simply returns to whatever
state one was in before consumption. See LaGuardia, Shafer.. But we must remember
that those people with addictive personalities can come to psychologically depend
on anything, and those using cannabis to ease their suffering may depend upon
it as a medicine. This does not mean that the hundreds of millions of people
worldwide are cannabis addicts.
Q: Does Marijuana Use Cause Long-Term Cognitive Deficits?: Four letters in the Journal of the American Medical Association, 22 May 2002
Q: Is cannabis a 'gateway drug'?
A: No, otherwise the 5 million smokers of 1991 would be addicts of other drugs
by now. The situation in Holland has confirmed that cannabis use does not lead
to drug use. In any case a huge percentage of the population takes drugs of
one sort or another. The fact that a lot of heroin users previously took cannabis
does not suggest that most cannabis users will ever take heroin.
Q: Do you advocate the use of cannabis?
A: We would like to be able to advocate the medicinal use of cannabis in preference
to many prescribed drugs, as well as advocate the preferred use of cannabis
for hard drug users. Unfortunately if we did this we would be subject to arrest
for incitement.
Q: Some doctors, nurses and drug workers frequently tell us that they see
people, especially young ones, who suffer from mental problems due to cannabis.
Surely legalisation would increase the numbers?
A: These problems do not seem to occur in the East where cannabis has been used
for centuries. Nobody would deny that a certain percentage of society suffers
mental problems, understandable maybe under the pressures that western society
often puts people under, and specifically applied to cannabis users under a
legal system which threatens them with arrest. It is more likely that these
cases are mentally nor ill people who use cannabis, rather than the case of
cannabis causing the illness. We must remember of course that all of these cases
apply to banned cannabis - how sure are we that it is pure cannabis that has
been used, and can we be sure that no dangerous illicit drugs have been used
But the essential question is: should the law punish people who suffer mental
illnesses if they consume cannabis? Should it punish those who use cannabis
at all. Surely ill people need help, not fines and prison.
It also appears true that cannabis may help bring some of these problems to
the surface where they can be recognised and dealt with.
Q: When was cannabis made illegal?
A: In the UK in 1928. As a result of the mis-classification of cannabis as a
narcotic.
Q: How many cannabis users in the world?
A:: An estimated 600 million - probably far too low.
Q: Is cannabis fat-soluble? Does it stay in your system?
A: Yes, for from 14 to 40 days. But this is long after any effect has worn off
and it causes no harm.
Q: What are the other uses of cannabis?
A: Besides social use and medicinal use, as a fibre for paper, rope and cloth,
as a building material and board for furniture, packing material, animal bedding,
foodstuff, prevents land erosion, to make plastic, paints, varnish, and sealant,
as a fuel, as a lubricant etc. See here.
Q: What are the penalties for cannabis?
A: For possession, ion the UK, anything from a caution to five years with or
without a fine up to £2500. For cultivation, supply, possession with intent,
importation and conspiracy (including being concerned or knowingly involved
with any of these offences), up to 15 years in prison with an unlimited fine
and confiscation of assets. In Holland the sentences for even huge amounts are
relatively light. In some countries even the death penalty is a possibility.
In India the law is so crazy that there is a maximum sentence of 5 years for
over 5 grams of ganja (herb) but a MINIMUM sentence of 10 years for over 5 grams
of charas (resin).
Q:: What are the dangers of smoking cannabis?
A: Mixing it with tobacco.
Getting arrested.
Health hazards from impurities.
Being offered drugs.
Becoming a social outcast = persecution.
Conviction = criminal record, banned from USA, Australia etc.
All prohibition created problems.
Q: Is cannabis at all dangerous?
A: Of course, everything has some danger. You can drown in water, air starts
fires, and you can choke on a sweet. Cannabis is about as dangerous as the same
sized piece of wood. You could hit somebody with a large lump. However, cannabis
was described, by DEA Administrator Judge Francis Young, as one of the safest
of substances.
Q: Is decriminalisation a step in the right direction? A: No. Decriminalisation is simple turning a blind eye to small time users or growers. It simply avoids the real issues of control. Cannabis quality could not be tested. We want the weed to be free. We want it sold by reputable dealers with their profits taxed. We do not want limits on the amount possessed or amount of plants cultivated.
Q: What about synthetic cannabis?
A: Research is continuing to produce medicinal cannabis substances that do not
give a high when consumed. Cannabis is a holistic plant - the whole plant is
necessary. Synthetic 'drugs' such as Nabilone are considered virtually useless
compared with natural cannabis and can have unpleasant side effects such as
depression. Cannabis usually alleviates depression.
Q: In third world countries the poor and unemployed are seen sitting smoking
cannabis, they never seem to get anything together and remain poor. Isn't this
an effect of cannabis? That is, does the use of cannabis a-motivate?
A: No. The reverse is true. Because they are poor and unemployed they have time
to sit and smoke. Cannabis grows wild in many of these countries. They smoke
it because it helps them stay happy in their positions. In the same countries
many working people smoke cannabis. You do not see them on the streets because
they work and smoke at home. The same is true in Britain.
It would take a million wise men to answer all the questions one fool can ask.